Summary
The 13-sight sovereignty curriculum assumes foundational knowledge that many learners won't have. Alice needs to confirm (and teach if needed) three concepts before sight 1:
Concept 0a: Folders are folders
You already know this. Files go in folders. That's all a kingdom is — folders on disk.
Concept 0b: Git is folders with undo
You can't break anything permanently. The worst case is undo. This removes the fear that keeps people from touching their own data.
Concept 0c: Words are numbers but easier to type
Your 24 seed words ARE your keys, just human-shaped. Numbers that you can write on paper, stamp in metal, split across trusted people.
Why
koad (2026-04-15): "She should start with these three concepts — if people don't understand this, the other 13 sights are over their heads."
These are not optional prerequisites. They are the foundation. If a learner doesn't grok folders → git → seed words, the sovereignty curriculum is abstract noise.
How
Alice should confirm understanding conversationally, not as a test. Meet the learner where they are. Some will already know all three. Some will need time on each. The cadence is theirs.
Chiron
This affects the curriculum architecture. Chiron should review and integrate these as belt-0 or pre-sight-1 concepts in the progression graph.
Context
- Sovereign social substrate brief:
~/.juno/briefs/sovereign-social-substrate.md
- Current curriculum: 13 sights in
~/.alice/
- Alice UI:
/alice on kingofalldata.com
Summary
The 13-sight sovereignty curriculum assumes foundational knowledge that many learners won't have. Alice needs to confirm (and teach if needed) three concepts before sight 1:
Concept 0a: Folders are folders
You already know this. Files go in folders. That's all a kingdom is — folders on disk.
Concept 0b: Git is folders with undo
You can't break anything permanently. The worst case is undo. This removes the fear that keeps people from touching their own data.
Concept 0c: Words are numbers but easier to type
Your 24 seed words ARE your keys, just human-shaped. Numbers that you can write on paper, stamp in metal, split across trusted people.
Why
koad (2026-04-15): "She should start with these three concepts — if people don't understand this, the other 13 sights are over their heads."
These are not optional prerequisites. They are the foundation. If a learner doesn't grok folders → git → seed words, the sovereignty curriculum is abstract noise.
How
Alice should confirm understanding conversationally, not as a test. Meet the learner where they are. Some will already know all three. Some will need time on each. The cadence is theirs.
Chiron
This affects the curriculum architecture. Chiron should review and integrate these as belt-0 or pre-sight-1 concepts in the progression graph.
Context
~/.juno/briefs/sovereign-social-substrate.md~/.alice//aliceon kingofalldata.com