VirtualBox image?

[kungfooman]

Hi, as this was posted on HackerNews and I wanna test it, where can I download an image?

[jvburnes]

Hi kungfooman.

It source only right now and only for OSX because that's my laptop :)

As soon as we mod the build files for Linux/BSD you should have something you could make an image from. Have patience.

[rvs]

I don't think VirtualBox image is particularly useful for node9, a Docker image, on the other hand can come really handy for people who want to play with it. In fact, I've created a first cut at getting this done here https://github.com/rvs/node9/blob/docker/Dockerfile

With it -- you can now run the following command on Linux, MacOS or even Windows (with 0 prerequisites I might add):

$ docker build -t node9 .
$ docker run -it node9
node9 First Edition (20150610), build: 1608949702  main (pid=10)
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  node9/kernel: initializing terminal
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  node9/kernel: loading
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  node9/kernel: initializing namespace
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  node9/kernel: binding standard streams
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  node9/kernel: initializing host environment
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  node9/kernel: accepting requests
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  node9/kernel: starting luaspace ...
Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020  signals set
(/appl/sh): started
[the time on the console is Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020]
;

Not sure how @jvburnes feels about this -- but perhaps we can merge this in and also publish our current builds on DockerHUB so people can simply run the last command all by itself.

[jvburnes]

Actually it's a pretty cool idea. Makes it easy to install and run.

…

On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 7:29 PM Roman V Shaposhnik ***@***.***> wrote: I don't think VirtualBox image is particularly useful for node9, a Docker image, on the other hand can come really handy for people who want to play with it. In fact, I've created a first cut at getting this done here https://github.com/rvs/node9/blob/docker/Dockerfile With it -- you can now run the following command on Linux, MacOS or even Windows (with 0 prerequisites I might add: $ docker build -t node9 . $ docker run -it node9 node9 First Edition (20150610), build: 1608949702 main (pid=10) Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 node9/kernel: initializing terminal Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 node9/kernel: loading Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 node9/kernel: initializing namespace Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 node9/kernel: binding standard streams Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 node9/kernel: initializing host environment Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 node9/kernel: accepting requests Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 node9/kernel: starting luaspace ... Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020 signals set (/appl/sh): started [the time on the console is Sat Dec 26 02:28:29 2020] ; Not sure how @jvburnes <https://github.com/jvburnes> feels about this -- but perhaps we can merge this in and also publish our current builds on DockerHUB so people can simply run the last command all by itself. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKJIO46UJYZKZ547AHQYTDSWVDA5ANCNFSM4BIE5Z4A> .

[rvs]

I'll submit a PR then @jvburnes

And since we're going to have Dockerfile infrastructure -- do you want me to help setup GitHub Actions to automatically build the images? Here's roughly how it would look like https://github.com/lf-edge/adam/actions?query=workflow%3APublish with a definition like https://github.com/lf-edge/adam/actions/runs/439648024/workflow

Then we would just need to pick up a DockerHUB repo for publishing (let me know if you'd like to set it up yourself or you'd want me to do that). I suggest we do it under node9 account name which seems to be available on DockerHUB https://hub.docker.com/u/node9 (note 404)

[jvburnes]

Go ahead and set it up. It sounds like a great way to get over the build hump!

…

On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 9:11 PM Roman V Shaposhnik ***@***.***> wrote: I'll submit a PR then @jvburnes <https://github.com/jvburnes> And since we're going to have Dockerfile infrastructure -- do you want me to help setup GitHub Actions to automatically build the images? Here's roughly how it would look like https://github.com/lf-edge/adam/actions?query=workflow%3APublish with a definition like https://github.com/lf-edge/adam/actions/runs/439648024/workflow Then we would just need to pick up a DockerHUB repo for publishing (let me know if you'd like to set it up yourself or you'd want me to do that). I suggest we do it under node9 account name which seems to be available on DockerHUB https://hub.docker.com/u/node9 (note 404) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKJIOZZDWIU7MMT5UF66JTSWVO5TANCNFSM4BIE5Z4A> .

[rvs]

Hey @jvburnes -- I've created a node9 organization on DockerHUB and submit a Pull Request that takes advantage of it. Please respond with your DockerHUB ID here so I can add you to the organization as an admin.

[jvburnes]

Will do.

…

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:39 PM Roman V Shaposhnik ***@***.***> wrote: Hey @jvburnes <https://github.com/jvburnes> -- I've created a node9 organization on DockerHUB and submit a Pull Request that takes advantage of it. Please respond with your DockerHUB ID here so I can add you to the organization as an admin. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKJIO62EDP7YSJGFH7YUGTSXE6NBANCNFSM4BIE5Z4A> .