I see growing interest to this project (if you can call 3 stars and 1 watcher that way). Maybe I should make this right. There are many problems in MCSHub right now. For example, mysterious sentence in README.md file:
On Wiki that is connected to this repository on GitHub you will find an information about mcshub configuration.
There is no documentation as you may notice. But I think that it would be better to reimplement MCSHub with the aim on the future improvements and growth instead of writing a documentation for current version.
Currently, I want to make a new MCSHub similar to NGINX Unit. There will be control port (HTTP server over unix or TCP socket), Minecraft server port and configuration storage.
Configuration will be stored as JSON file. But it will be possible to send YAML data to control port (because I love YAML).
The idea of routes, matches and actions from NGINX Unit will be implemented for MCSHub too.
Many features from current MCSHub will be removed with possibility to reimplement it as separate process talking with MCSHub control port.
You can write your suggestions in this issue.
I see growing interest to this project (if you can call 3 stars and 1 watcher that way). Maybe I should make this right. There are many problems in MCSHub right now. For example, mysterious sentence in README.md file:
There is no documentation as you may notice. But I think that it would be better to reimplement MCSHub with the aim on the future improvements and growth instead of writing a documentation for current version.
Currently, I want to make a new MCSHub similar to NGINX Unit. There will be control port (HTTP server over unix or TCP socket), Minecraft server port and configuration storage.
Configuration will be stored as JSON file. But it will be possible to send YAML data to control port (because I love YAML).
The idea of routes, matches and actions from NGINX Unit will be implemented for MCSHub too.
Many features from current MCSHub will be removed with possibility to reimplement it as separate process talking with MCSHub control port.
You can write your suggestions in this issue.