I'm wondering if this is the right place to discuss the following things about the EIP documents that we're composing as part of this ABI standardization work:
- Style/flow improvements to the base content (which came from the Solidity docs and was composed by many contributors)
- Decisions about how much expository text to include vs. terse mathematical definitions (I had some ideas for adding expository sections but maybe it's appropriate for the spec itself to use a mathematical style of definition and leave the exposition to some kind of supplementary document that is not part of an EIP.)
I'm wondering if this is the right place to discuss the following things about the EIP documents that we're composing as part of this ABI standardization work: