Note: This page was automatically converted from markdown to org; there may be some LaTeX formatting breakage
- Branches
- WP: Mathematics Subject Classification
-
Arxiv mathematics subcategorization
- Possible entry points
- math.HO - History and Overview
- math.GM - General Mathematics
- Possible entry points
- Table of contents of “The Princeton companion to mathematics” (PCM)
- Every branch of mathematics has its own problems and theorems.
- Every branch is a highly specialized subfield.
- Two branches are likely mutually unintelligible.
- People, blogs, portals, and wikis
- Search engines
- MathSciNet, math publication search engine
- Industrial mathematics
- Surveys
- Stories
-
http://bentilly.blogspot.co.id/2009/11/why-i-left-math.html
-
http://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion104.html
- Has mathematics become too large? Does anybody understand what everybody else is doing anymore?
-
http://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion104.html
-
http://bentilly.blogspot.co.id/2009/11/why-i-left-math.html
- Undigested
- MathLang, a framework for computerising mathematics; Fairouz Kamareddine, Tuesday 14 September 2006
- Boolean algebra
- Enumerating all propositional-calculus predicates?
- Picking a random predicate?
- Is this related?
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_normal_form
- Quine–McCluskey algorithm for minimizing Boolean functions
- Abstract
- Buchberger’s algorithm: “generalization of Euclidean algorithm for univariate GCD and of Gaussian elimination for linear systems”.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorics
- Complex number
-
Foundation of mathematics
- logic?
- ZFC = *Z*ermelo-*F*raenkel set theory with axiom of *C*hoice
- Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
- homotopy type theory
- Mathematics?
- https://mathwithbaddrawings.com/2015/02/24/why-do-we-pay-mathematicians/
- https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-significance-of-Teichmuller-theory
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1815545/what-is-an-example-of-a-non-standard-model-of-peano-arithmetic
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_model_of_arithmetic
- http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.164.320&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Every area/part/subfield of mathematics center around some theorems and problems. What are the areas of mathematics, what are their problems, and what are their most important theorems? How did they start out? What was the problem that motivated them?
- Formalizing mathematics, John Harrison, Intel Corporation, 2007
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1767070/what-is-the-current-state-of-formalized-mathematics
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_finite_simple_groups
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2217995/simple-theorems-that-are-instances-of-deep-mathematics
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_statistics
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_combinatorics
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_graph_theory
- string diagrams, Paul-André Melliès
- probability
- https://mathoverflow.net/questions/131435/why-dont-more-mathematicians-improve-wikipedia-articles
- https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/5772/when-was-the-function-arrow-notation-x-mapsto-y-first-used/5777
- Expositories
- http://www.mathontheweb.org/mathweb/mi-newjs.html
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/advances-in-mathematics/most-cited-articles
- Selmer Bringsjord, course, “Introduction to formal logic”
- Where are reference works for mathematics?
- real analysis
- G. A. Edgar, Transseries for beginners, a well-written mathematics paper
- Mathematical Knowledge Management
- WP:Mathematical knowledge management
- I think we can go a long way by presenting every knowledge in “X is a Y” form. Something is almost always something else. Everything is almost always similar to something else.
- Real numbers
- Between two real numbers, there exists real numbers.
-
$∀ a, z ∈ \Real; a < z :$ $∃ m ∈ \Real : a < m < z$
-
- WP:Real number
- Between two real numbers, there exists real numbers.
- What is the history of category theory? Who invented it? Why?
- What is a graph?
- A graph has vertices and edges.
- What is an undirected graph? What is a directed graph?
- A undirected graph is a graph whose edges are unordered pairs.
- A directed graph is a graph whose edges are ordered pairs.
- Which one is the default?
- In this document, when we say just “graph”, we mean “directed graph”.
- What is a pre-category?
- What is a category?
- A category has objects and morphisms, and satisfies the category axioms.
- What is an object?
- Anything. It’s undefined, like “point” in geometry.
- What is a morphism?
- What are the category axioms?
- What is an object?
- A category can be thought of as a graph whose edge relation is reflexive and transitive.
- A category has objects and morphisms, and satisfies the category axioms.
- What is a functor?
- A functor maps a category to another category.
- The endofunctors on a category
$C$ form a category called the functor category of$C$ .- Category theory is recursive.
- What is a natural transformation?
- What is an adjunction?
- What is a monad?
- A monad is a triple
$(T,μ,η)$ .
- A monad is a triple
- Courses
- John Baez on adjoints, joins, and meets, part of applied category theory course
- Books
- An introduction to category theory with over 200 exercises and solutions available by Harold Simmons.
- What is the progress?
- In 2017, Norbert Blum (Prof. Dr. in CS at Bonn, Germany) proposed a proof, found out that it failed, and explained why it failed. See also the news on theregister.co.uk and the discussion on CSSE 38803.
- G.J. Woeginger’s P-vs-NP page says that the most recent attempt is in 2016. It lists a hundred of failed attempts.
- From 2015: [[https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/2shpn7/has_there_been_any_progress_on_the_seven/][/r/askscience: Has there been any progress on the seven millennium [math] prize problems?]]
- From 2014: Quora: Has there been any progress on the other millennium prize problems?
- From 2009: Lance Fortnow’s CACM 2009 review article “The Status of the P Versus NP Problem”
- What are the Clay Millenium Prize Problems?
The Clay Mathematics Institute of Cambridge, Massachusetts (CMI),
offers one million US dollars for each solution of the seven problems,
of which these are unsolved:
- Riemann hypothesis
- Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture
- Hodge conjecture official problem description
- P versus NP problem, of computational complexity theory
- Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness
- Yang–Mills and mass gap official problem description
- What is the CMI? Why was it founded? What is it doing?
- Why did the CMI select those problems?
- Abbreviations
- NSE: Navier–Stokes equations
- Where did the NSE come from?
- How do we derive the NSE from the laws of physics?
- How did Navier arrive at the equations? How did Stokes? What were they doing?
- Wolfram note 996d
- Liwei Chen, A brief history of Navier–Stokes equation
- Are there other more reliable sources?
- How do the NSE extend the Euler equations?
- How many equations are in the NSE?
- What is modeled by the NSE? What are the variables of the NSE?
- Velocity, pressure, temperature, density (NASA).
- How are the Navier-Stokes equations derived from Newton’s laws of motion?
- Reading triage
- official problem description
- Navier–Stokes equations
- Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness
- Wikipedia: Navier–Stokes equations
- Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness. See also the “Partial results” section.
- https://www.comsol.com/multiphysics/navier-stokes-equations
- https://samjshah.com/2009/11/10/navier-stokes-equations-for-the-layperson/
- http://notes.dpdx.net/2006/10/06/penny-smiths-proof-on-the-navier-stokes-equations/
- What is the continuity equation?
- https://www.quora.com/topic/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes-Existence-and-Smoothness-Problem
- 2018-08-12: The Riemann hypothesis Wikipedia page is more comprehensive than this page.
- official problem description
- a more elementary problem that is equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis, 2001, Jeffrey C. Lagarias
- A study of the Riemann zeta function, 2017, Yochay Jerby
- Notes on the Riemann Hypothesis, 2010, published 2017, Ricardo Pérez-Marco
- Riemann zeta function is an analytical continuation of a Dirichlet series?
- Wikipedia: Riemann zeta function
- “Understanding the Riemann hypothesis”: Markus Shepherd (né Schepke)’s blog and journey towards understanding the Riemann hypothesis.
- What is the history of the Riemann zeta function? How did it arise? What were people trying to do?
- How are these related?
- Euler’s totient function?
- Prime counting function?
- Twin prime conjecture
- Prime gap problem
- Number theory? Analysis?
- Gamma function
- Stirling’s approximation of factorials
- Cryptography?
- Gamma function
- number theory and complexity theory
- Wikipedia: Prime number
- https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/01/19/the-de-bruijn-newman-constant-is-non-negativ/
- official problem description
- Wikipedia: Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture
- How are these related?
- Faltings’s theorem
- Genus of an algebraic curve
- Arithmetic genus
- Hodge number
- complex vector space
- Hodge number
- Arithmetic genus
- Genus of an algebraic curve
- Faltings’s theorem
An example ordered pair is
A relation
Iff
A relation is not just a subset of a Cartesian product. The domains and codomains matter.
A function is a relation in which each element of the domain is related to exactly one thing.
Let
The notation of “applying
A partial function is a relation in which each element of the domain is related to at most one thing. If you replace “at most one” with “exactly one”, you get the definition of a function.
If a partial function
The symbol
We can totalize a partial function
- if
$(a,b) ∈ F$ , then$(a,b) ∈ F_\bot$ ; - otherwise,
$(a,\bot) ∈ F_\bot$ .
What is the difference between “undefined” and “bottom”?
The “bottom” of a set
The function
- Two relations are equal iff
- their domains are equal,
- their codomains are equal, and
- their mappings are equal.
- Formally,
$(A_1,B_1,R_1) = (A_2,B_2,R_2)$ iff-
$A_1 = A_2$ , -
$B_1 = B_2$ , and -
$R_1 = R_2$ .
-
- Functions are relations.
- Equality of functions is equality of relations.
- Intension vs extension
- Consider:
-
$f : \Nat → \Nat$ , ( f(n) = n + n ), -
$g : \Nat → \Nat$ , ( g(n) = 2 ⋅ n ).
-
- Observe:
- They are extensionally equal:
$f(n) = g(n)$ for all$n$ . - They are not intensionally equal:
$f ≠ g$ . - Their outputs match, but they are not the same function.
- They are extensionally equal:
- Problem:
- When do we care about intension?
- Do we ever care at all?
- Consider:
These functions idn and idz are different functions.
idn : Nat -> Nat
idn x => x
idz : Int -> Int
idz x => x\begin{align*}
[idn] = (\Nat, \Nat , x → x)
[idz] = (\Integers, \Integers, x → x)
\end{align*}
The slides the lambda calculus has some explanation of the semanticses of lambda calculus. The slides are a part of Yale CS-430/CS-530 formal semantics course.
We motivate the definition of the limit of a sequence.
A sequence
Note that the bounds do not have to occur in the sequence itself.
If we have a sequence
Now that we have defined the limit of a sequence,
we can now define the limit of a function as its input approaches a value.
Let
Another way we can define $limx → a f(x)$ is by the epsilon-delta definition of limit as done by Cauchy, Bolzano, and Weierstrass.
A generalized sequence is a function from an index set
- Bad teachers make students hate the subject being taught.
- Bad math teachers make students hate math.
- Bad teachers waste humans, brains, the future of nations, the future of humanity.
- How many people can think but won’t because their teachers suck?
- How many people can do math but won’t because their math teachers suck?
- How many people can think but won’t because their teachers suck?
- How do we make learning materials that are not teacher brain dump?
- Textbooks should answer “Why should I care?”
- Everywhere in mathematics is logic.
- Everything is a consequence of the definitions.
- Everything that is true has always been true.
- It’s just that we haven’t proved it.
- Calculus should be taught with infinitesimals (instead of delta-epsilon)?
- Pros
- more intuitive
- simplifies probability theory
- Cons
- some topology (and perhaps some other advanced mathematics) uses delta-epsilon
- 2016, “Teaching Calculus with Infinitesimals”, Rebecca Vinsonhaler
- “This article argues that first semester calculus courses for non-mathematics majors should be taught using infinitesimals.”
- 1976, “The Teaching of Elementary Calculus Using the Nonstandard Analysis Approach”, Kathleen Sullivan
- https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-schools-and-textbooks-use-non-standard-analysis-to-teach-calculus
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2097694/why-is-non-standard-analysis-not-fully-or-at-all-integrated-in-our-current-schoo
- https://kew1beans.wordpress.com/2014/10/20/167/
- https://cornellmath.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/non-nonstandard-calculus-i/
- non-standard probability theory
- 1975, “Nonstandard probability”, S. Michael Webb
- Pros
- Setting the attitude
- “Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things. You just get used to them.” John von Neumann (1903–1957) (source)
- Mathematics is English and some rules (or whatever your language is). People who can understand English can get used to mathematics (with effort).
- Mathematics is a tower of concepts.
- Mathematics is a chain of concepts.
- Mathematics is a tree of concepts.
- Definitions
- Definitions are important. Your first reaction when you encounter an unknown word should be “What’s its definition?” For example, a group is a set and a binary operation satisfying the group axioms. If you’re new, your questions should be “What is a set?”, “What is a binary operation?”, and “What are the group axioms?”, and then you should search them on the Internet. (Don’t do it right now; it’s just an example.)
- Read the definition. Try to use the definition. Find some examples. You will forget. It’s OK. Read them again later after you forgot. It takes several times of forgetting to get used to it, and eventually you’ll get a feel of it. You must expect to forget, because forgetting is part of learning.
- Mathematicians invent new words to do more with less words. It’s more efficient to say “$G$ is a group” than write the group axioms in full every time a group needs to be declared.
- Notation
- A mathematical notation, like the Latin alphabet, is a way of writing English (or whatever your language is). When you read “math”, you are really reading the same language that you speak everyday.
- When you encounter symbols in a sentence, think about how they should read in English to make the whole sentence grammatically correct.
- Mathematical notations also have slangs and inconsistencies, just like English. We’re human after all.
- An equation
$A=B$ means you can change every$A$ with$B$ , and every$B$ with$A$ , everywhere you find them, as long as the context is still the same. - Don’t hate the notation. Used properly, it saves your time and others’ time.
- Note: Please memorize the 48 symbols in the Greek alphabet (24 capital letters and 24 small letters).
“Probstat” is “probability and statistics”.
- Basic probability modeling
- Model coins and dices, both fair and biased, and combination
- Multiple coin tosses
- Conditional probability
- Bayes rule
- Sensitivity and specificity
- False positive and false negative
- Testing the test
- Counting exhaustively
- Monty Hall problem
- WP: Boy-or-girl paradox (need unambiguous problem statement)
- Basic combinatorics (counting combinations)
- Randomness
- Basic statistics
- Collection? Dataset? Sample?
- Variable vs parameter
- Collect data
- Design a survey
- WP: Statistical data type
- Calculate descriptive statistics
- More rigor
- Measure theory
- Continuous probability
- Where should these be? How should we organize this?
- Determining coin fairness
- Random variable
- Not a variable, and not random?
- Inferential statistics
- Infer something about the population from samples.
- How do we sample the population correctly?
- Case study: election “quick count” or “exit poll”
- Estimation
- Bias
- Point estimation
- Likelihood
- Maximum likelihood estimation?
- Fitting
- Consider replacing “regression” with “fitting”.
- Line fitting with one independent variable
- Random process
- Random walk
- Stochastic integral
- Markov process
- How do we interpret very small probabilities?
- Expectation, expected value
- Distribution
- Normal distribution
- Central limit theorem
- Renewal theory
- Decision theory
- WP: Optimal stopping
- Betting
- Bookmaking
- Probability or statistics first?
- Stats SE 219733: What should be taught first: Probability or Statistics?
- Quora: Should I study probability or statistics first? Why?
- Probability, statistics, sample, and population
- Probabilistic modeling: assume population, infer sample
- Inferential statistics: gather sample, infer population
- http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~skiena/jaialai/excerpts/node12.html
- Probability looks to the future. Statistics looks to the past.
- Just like finance and accounting.
- Probability looks to the future. Statistics looks to the past.
- Example syllabuses:
- Undergraduate-level
- Postgraduate-level
There are three doors.
Let the set of doors be ( D = { 1, 2, 3 } ).
One door
The host knows which is which. The contestant doesn’t.
The host asks the contestant to pick a door.
The contestant chooses a door
The host opens another door
The host asks the contestant whether he wants to switch (to the door that is neither
Should the contestant switch?
Yes.
A calculation is in WP: Monty Hall problem.
“Random” means “we don’t know why”.
We see randomness because we ignore details.
Randomness is due to the details ignored by our models.
Coin tosses are unpredictable, but the statistics of coin tosses is predictable.
“The software crashes randomly.” means “We don’t know why it crashes.” There is a cause, but we’re ignoring it.
What is the difference between these words: random, haphazard, chaotic, unpredictable, uncertain, noisy?
The arity of a relation is its number of parameters.
For example, if
Relations of arity 0, 1, and 2 are also called nullary, unary, and binary, respectively.
A constant is a nullary relation.
A set is a unary relation.
We can write either
What is the difference between a relation and a predicate?
A pedantic note:
Theoretically, a formula is not a truth value,
and it is the interpretation that maps formulas to truth values.
For example, if
These are isomorphic:
- binary relation,
- transition system,
- rewriting system,
- directed graph (digraph).
Every binary relation
Let
Iff
Iff
The composition of
The $n$th self-composition of
The infinite self-composition of
The transitive closure of
A mono-unary algebra
There is always an injection from a unary algebra
There is also always an injection from a magma
If
If
If
If
The variety of
Lemma: There is always an isomorphism between two varieties of unary algebras whose underlying sets have the same cardinality.
Corollary: if
If
If
If
Lemma: If there is a bijection between
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/243590/bijection-from-mathbb-r-to-mathbb-rn
Lemma: If there is a bijection between
Conclusion: there is an isomorphism between the set of $(A,f)$s and the set of $(A^2,g)$s.
A homomorphism from
Let there be these structures:
- The unary system
$(A, f)$ where$f : A → A$ . - The fixpointed unar
$(A, f, p)$ where$f~p = p$ . - The magma
$(A, g)$ where$g : A → A → A$ . - The semigroup
$(A, g)$ where$g$ is associative. - The semigroup
$(A, g, a)$ with left-absorbing element$a$ . - The unar
$(A^2, h)$ where$A^2 = A × A$ .
A fixpoint in the unar becomes a left-absorbing element in the magma.
The semigroup is non-commutative:
Therefore there is a homomorphism from the algebra of unary systems to the algebra of non-commutative semigroups.
A left-absorbing element in the binar becomes the left component of a fixpoint in the unar. $$ (g~p~y, ~y) = (p,y) = h~(p,y) $$
Another way to embed: $$ \begin{align*} (g~x~y, ~ g~y~x) = h~(x,y) \ (g~p~y, ~ g~y~p) = (p, ~ f~y) = h~(p,y) \ (g~x~p, ~ g~p~x) = (f~x, ~ p) = h~(x,p) \end{align*} $$
Flip, like negation: $$ m~(x,y) = m~(y,x) $$
Lemma: If
There is always an injection from a unary algebra
There is always an injection from a directed graph | x ∈ X, ~ E~x~y \}$.
Every magma
\begin{align*} n~(x,y) = (y,x) \ g~(u,v)~(x,y) = (f~u~v, f~x~y) \end{align*}
There is an isomorphism between unary systems and magmas.
- Measure
- Integral
A Jordan content is…
A content
-
$m(x) ≥ 0$ , -
$m(∅) = 0$ , and - if
$X∪ Y = ∅$ , then$m(X ∪ Y) = m(X) + m(Y)$ .
A measure is a content that is countably additive.
A Lebesgue measure for
A measure space is a set and a measure on that set.
A measurable function is …
- 1989, article, “Mathematical writing”, Donald E. Knuth, Tracy Larrabee, and Paul M. Roberts, [pdf](http://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/reviewing-papers/knuth_mathematical_writing.pdf)
- “Many readers will skim over formulas on their first reading of your exposition. Therefore, your sentences should flow smoothly when all but the simplest formulas are replaced by ‘blah’ or some other grunting noise. (p. 3)
- Which point of view should we use?
- We can see a function as a special kind of relation.
- We can see a relation from \( A \) to \( B \) as a function from \( A \) to \( 2^B \).
- Every binary relation \((A,B,r)\) is a function \((A,2^B,f)\)
where \(f(x) = \{ y
\|r(x,y) \}\).
- Every binary relation \((A,B,r)\) is a function \((A,2^B,f)\)
where \(f(x) = \{ y
- Which is more primitive: function or relation?
https://dyske.com/paper/825 “When I was in 7th grade, my math teacher answered an obvious but difficult question: Why do we have to study advanced math, if we are never going to use it in our adult lives? He said it’s because the same parts of our brains used for math can be used for many other things in life. With this short explanation, he utterly convinced me the importance of studying math, and of any other subjects for that matter.”
- WP:Mathematical model
- WP:Many-body problem
- WP:Few-body systems
- WP:N-body problem
- Articles
- What is the difference between variable and parameter?
- How many parameters do we need to model a system?
- Discrete Newtonian kinematical model
- A system at time \( t \) is a set of particles ( { 1, \ldots, n } ).
- Time is a real number: \( t ∈ \Real \).
- The number of particle is constant \( n ∈ \Nat \).
- For each particle \( k \):
- It has position \( x_k ∈ \Real^3 \).
- Simplifying assumptions
- particle
- It is a point.
- It doesn’t occupy any space.
- Its mass is not modeled.
- It is a point.
- Time is global and absolute (the same everywhere).
- particle
- A system at time \( t \) is a set of particles ( { 1, \ldots, n } ).
- Discrete Newtonian dynamical model (N-body problem) extends discrete Newtonian kinematical model.
- A system at time \( t \) is all that above, plus:
- For each particle \( k \):
- It has mass \( m_k ∈ \Real \).
- It has resultant force \( F_k \) acting on it.
- Simplifying assumptions about the particle
- It is rigid.
- It doesn’t deform.
- It doesn’t break.
- Its mass is constant.
- It don’t interact with other particles.
- Particles don’t merge or collide.
- It is rigid.
- For each particle \( k \):
- A system at time \( t \) is all that above, plus:
- WP:Continuum mechanics
- Skippable philosophical issues?
- Does “the same particle at different times” make sense?
- What is “same”?
- WP:”Panta rhei” (“Everything flows”), Heraclitus
- Does “the same particle at different times” make sense?