diff --git a/assets/img/people/reuben-addison.jpg b/assets/img/people/reuben-addison.jpg index 25c3afa..3af38d3 100644 Binary files a/assets/img/people/reuben-addison.jpg and b/assets/img/people/reuben-addison.jpg differ diff --git a/people/reuben-addison.html b/people/reuben-addison.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..776d354 --- /dev/null +++ b/people/reuben-addison.html @@ -0,0 +1,373 @@ + + + + + + Reuben N. Addison, Ph.D. — DS4CABS Summer Intern + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+ + + DS4CABS · 2026 Summer Intern + +
+
+ Portrait of Reuben N. Addison +
+ +
+

Reuben N. Addison, Ph.D.

+

Clinical Research Scientist · Quantitative Researcher

+

DePauw University · DS4CABS 2026 Summer Intern

+ + +
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+ +
+

About

+

+ Reuben Addison is a clinical research scientist and quantitative researcher working at the + intersection of study design, Bayesian statistics, and biomedical data science. His work + focuses on making the assumptions behind scientific and clinical decisions explicit, + traceable, and testable. +

+

+ His research spans Parkinson's disease, longitudinal clinical outcomes, cardiovascular + risk, movement science, and clinical trial design. He is an Assistant Professor of + Kinesiology and Director of the Motor Control Lab at DePauw University, holds a Ph.D. in + Motor Behavior, and completed the Computational Data Analytics Track, the data science + track, of Georgia Tech's M.S. in Analytics. +

+
+ +
+

CABS Internship Project

+

+ During the 2026 CABS Data Science Summer Internship, Reuben developed + OpenTrial, a Bayesian clinical trial design engine under the mentorship + of Prof. Shicheng Guo. +

+

+ OpenTrial starts with a treatment and endpoint, gathers relevant public evidence, and + produces a traceable study-design report. It integrates sources including + ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, openFDA, DailyMed, Open Targets, PharmGKB, and Semantic + Scholar, then connects that evidence to power, assurance, prior-sensitivity analysis, + predictive probability of success, and simulation-based design calculations. +

+

+ The central rule is simple: only evidence with a quantifiable effect size and associated + standard error is allowed to update the prior. Other records remain visible for provenance, + but they do not quietly influence the mathematics. +

+
+ +
+

Validation and Sensitivity Analysis

+

+ Reuben treated validation as part of the research problem, not as a final software check. + OpenTrial includes 100 offline tests and 46 independent validation checks against SciPy, + statsmodels, closed-form calculations, and separately written Monte Carlo implementations. +

+

+ That process exposed implementation problems that ordinary unit testing had missed, + including a Type I error calculation that appeared correct because calibration and + evaluation had reused the same simulated paths, and a heterogeneity calculation that + double-counted sampling error. Both were corrected. +

+
+ Type I error: 0.0234 against a 0.025 target. +
+
+ Prior sensitivity: in a seeded Type 2 diabetes example, the same + 80-patient-per-arm design produced an estimated probability of success of 0.87 under the + evidence-derived prior and 0.18 under a skeptical prior. The design did not change. The + assumption did. +
+
+ +
+

Areas of Focus

+
    +
  • Clinical trial design
  • +
  • Bayesian statistics
  • +
  • Biostatistics
  • +
  • Longitudinal modeling
  • +
  • Real-world evidence
  • +
  • Biomedical machine learning
  • +
  • Parkinson's disease
  • +
  • Movement science
  • +
  • Reproducible research
  • +
  • Evidence provenance
  • +
+
+ +
+

What's Next

+

+ Reuben is continuing to work at the intersection of clinical research, Bayesian trial + design, biomedical machine learning, and reproducible evidence pipelines through his lab + at DePauw and collaborations in biopharma. +

+

+ He is particularly interested in problems where quantitative methods can make a clinical + or development decision more transparent, reproducible, and easier to defend. OpenTrial + remains a learning-oriented research tool and is not validated for real-world clinical use. +

+
+ +
+
+
+ + + + + + + +