Skip to content

Customer discovery: 5-person HVAC team paying $500/mo for existing tool #35

Description

@diese-tech

Context

Cold call discovery from a local HVAC company owner.

The company is approximately a 5-person team and is currently paying around $500/month for their existing software/tool. The exact product name was not captured clearly because of audio/accent/service-call conditions.

Why this matters

This is direct validation of SwiftDispatch positioning:

Affordable growth option between whiteboards and ServiceTitan-level complexity/cost.

A 5-person team paying $500/month suggests small HVAC companies may already tolerate meaningful monthly software spend if the tool is tied to operations, dispatch, customer communication, or workflow management.

Product interpretation

This customer profile is close to the ideal SwiftDispatch wedge:

  • Small field-service team
  • Real operational need
  • Already paying for software
  • Likely cost-sensitive but not unwilling to pay
  • Potentially underserved if current tool is expensive, bloated, hard to use, or not matched to their workflow

Follow-up questions for future calls

Try to capture:

  1. What tool are they currently using?
  2. What do they pay per month and are there extra per-user/SMS/payment fees?
  3. What do they actually use it for daily?
  4. What do they hate about it?
  5. What do they wish it did better?
  6. Who uses it: owner, office manager, dispatcher, techs?
  7. How many jobs/calls do they handle per day or week?
  8. What would make them switch?
  9. Would they try a demo account if available?
  10. What price would feel like a no-brainer for a lighter tool?

Pricing signal

If a 5-person HVAC team is paying around $500/month today, SwiftDispatch may have room to price as the affordable alternative without racing to the bottom.

Potential hypothesis to test:

  • Starter around $99-$149/month for very small teams
  • Growth around $199-$299/month for teams that need dispatch + SMS + quoting
  • Pro/custom below heavy enterprise tools, but not cheap enough to imply hobby software

Acceptance criteria

  • Add this discovery note to the customer research log if one exists.
  • Follow up with this owner if possible to identify the current tool.
  • Use this as pricing validation input, not final pricing proof.
  • Ask future HVAC leads what they currently pay before showing SwiftDispatch pricing.

Risk

Do not overfit to one call. This is a signal, not a conclusion. The important insight is that small teams can already have real software budgets when the pain is operational enough.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions