Problem
The documentation suite is thorough (QUICKSTART.md, TUTORIAL.md, FAQ.md, etc.), but all examples are illustrative/mock — no real captured output from actual runs exists in the repo. A mathematician evaluating ProofPartner has no way to see what a successful run actually produces before committing their API key and money.
Why this matters
This is the lowest-effort, highest-impact adoption improvement. People don't try tools they can't preview. A curated set of real outputs answers: "What will I get?" and "Is this worth $5 per run?"
Proposal
Record and commit 2–3 actual end-to-end runs with real output artifacts:
-
Simple olympiad problem — e.g., a miniF2F problem via explore → formalize → prove. Show the full terminal output, final .lean file, and cost breakdown. This is the "hello world" that proves the tool works.
-
Exploration flow — explore on a rough mathematical idea, showing the ranked conjecture table with confidence scores and difficulty ratings. Demonstrates the Stage 0 → Stage 1 value proposition.
-
Novel conjecture formalization — a conjecture not in any benchmark, showing type-first formalization, IntentJudge verification, and (ideally) a successful proof. This is the use case no competitor supports.
For each, commit:
- Terminal output (captured via
script or tee)
- Generated
.lean artifacts
- Cost summary
- Brief annotation explaining what happened at each stage
These could live in examples/ or docs/demos/.
Problem
The documentation suite is thorough (QUICKSTART.md, TUTORIAL.md, FAQ.md, etc.), but all examples are illustrative/mock — no real captured output from actual runs exists in the repo. A mathematician evaluating ProofPartner has no way to see what a successful run actually produces before committing their API key and money.
Why this matters
This is the lowest-effort, highest-impact adoption improvement. People don't try tools they can't preview. A curated set of real outputs answers: "What will I get?" and "Is this worth $5 per run?"
Proposal
Record and commit 2–3 actual end-to-end runs with real output artifacts:
Simple olympiad problem — e.g., a miniF2F problem via
explore→formalize→prove. Show the full terminal output, final.leanfile, and cost breakdown. This is the "hello world" that proves the tool works.Exploration flow —
exploreon a rough mathematical idea, showing the ranked conjecture table with confidence scores and difficulty ratings. Demonstrates the Stage 0 → Stage 1 value proposition.Novel conjecture formalization — a conjecture not in any benchmark, showing type-first formalization, IntentJudge verification, and (ideally) a successful proof. This is the use case no competitor supports.
For each, commit:
scriptortee).leanartifactsThese could live in
examples/ordocs/demos/.