i haven't benchmarked the competition in a while, but last time i needed pdf parsing, i felt that llamaparse from llamaindex was the best. this is an external api.
is there a way to include the option of specific external parsers in the workflow?
i might be mis-interpreting the your goals, but it seems to me that you don't really want to compete with any of these specialized unstructured=>structured tools, you simply want attachments to allow many options via a simple, streamlined interface...
i haven't benchmarked the competition in a while, but last time i needed pdf parsing, i felt that llamaparse from llamaindex was the best. this is an external api.
is there a way to include the option of specific external parsers in the workflow?
i might be mis-interpreting the your goals, but it seems to me that you don't really want to compete with any of these specialized unstructured=>structured tools, you simply want
attachmentsto allow many options via a simple, streamlined interface...