Purpose
Evidence/admission owner for the human AppearanceConvention branch of local-roadmap R3. It cannot directly add a runtime scalar and does not block TechnicalQuality.
Correct the source state
Update the durable ledger for Shinomori & Takata:
- primary paper: doi:10.1364/JOSAA.546984;
- public Figshare supplement v3: doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28555439.v3;
- record exact retrieved bytes, filenames, SHA-256, license and extraction output;
- verify any previously reported digest against actual bytes; never copy a prose checksum blindly;
- distinguish participant-level raw availability from aggregate numerical supplements.
This source is development/negative evidence, not a future untouched holdout.
Construct-validity protocol
Before human lint/action admission freeze: construct/task/translation equivalence; culture/population/viewing/stimulus/output applicability; measurement invariance; preregistered features and multiplicity; study-level validation; uncertainty/practical margin; conflicts across populations; no pooling of incompatible adjective tasks; exact action class and protected outcomes.
Two sources or one source plus independent published holdout is necessary but not sufficient.
Explicit rejected shortcuts
Absolute chroma, C-star/Cmax, Berns vividness, saturation-is-cleaner, brightness-is-cleaner, one universal clean/dirty threshold, and silent cross-cultural transfer cannot be sole/default cleanliness laws. Sources may provide scoped candidate features or falsification evidence, not direct action authority.
Output algebra
LintAdmitted(profile, scope, uncertainty)
AutoActionAdmitted(profile, action class, non-inferiority proof)
Rejected(claim, reason)
NotExamined(missing source/access/contract)
Experimental(explicit opt-in)
Lint admission never implies action admission.
RED / reproducibility
- immutable source manifest/checksums/license/access;
- executable extraction from source bytes;
- negative/null/contradictory results retained;
- study-level split guard;
- no participant bootstrap without participant rows;
- mutation from ordinal/distributional output to universal scalar fails;
- mutation from lint to auto authority fails;
- protected readability/identity/sentiment/distinction cannot regress;
- no human profile still leaves TechnicalQuality total.
Acceptance
Refs #408 #431.
Purpose
Evidence/admission owner for the human AppearanceConvention branch of local-roadmap R3. It cannot directly add a runtime scalar and does not block TechnicalQuality.
Correct the source state
Update the durable ledger for Shinomori & Takata:
This source is development/negative evidence, not a future untouched holdout.
Construct-validity protocol
Before human lint/action admission freeze: construct/task/translation equivalence; culture/population/viewing/stimulus/output applicability; measurement invariance; preregistered features and multiplicity; study-level validation; uncertainty/practical margin; conflicts across populations; no pooling of incompatible adjective tasks; exact action class and protected outcomes.
Two sources or one source plus independent published holdout is necessary but not sufficient.
Explicit rejected shortcuts
Absolute chroma, C-star/Cmax, Berns vividness, saturation-is-cleaner, brightness-is-cleaner, one universal clean/dirty threshold, and silent cross-cultural transfer cannot be sole/default cleanliness laws. Sources may provide scoped candidate features or falsification evidence, not direct action authority.
Output algebra
Lint admission never implies action admission.
RED / reproducibility
Acceptance
Refs #408 #431.