Skip to content

[R3.2] Correct cleanliness evidence and freeze admission protocol #445

Description

@lemone112

Purpose

Evidence/admission owner for the human AppearanceConvention branch of local-roadmap R3. It cannot directly add a runtime scalar and does not block TechnicalQuality.

Correct the source state

Update the durable ledger for Shinomori & Takata:

  • primary paper: doi:10.1364/JOSAA.546984;
  • public Figshare supplement v3: doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28555439.v3;
  • record exact retrieved bytes, filenames, SHA-256, license and extraction output;
  • verify any previously reported digest against actual bytes; never copy a prose checksum blindly;
  • distinguish participant-level raw availability from aggregate numerical supplements.

This source is development/negative evidence, not a future untouched holdout.

Construct-validity protocol

Before human lint/action admission freeze: construct/task/translation equivalence; culture/population/viewing/stimulus/output applicability; measurement invariance; preregistered features and multiplicity; study-level validation; uncertainty/practical margin; conflicts across populations; no pooling of incompatible adjective tasks; exact action class and protected outcomes.

Two sources or one source plus independent published holdout is necessary but not sufficient.

Explicit rejected shortcuts

Absolute chroma, C-star/Cmax, Berns vividness, saturation-is-cleaner, brightness-is-cleaner, one universal clean/dirty threshold, and silent cross-cultural transfer cannot be sole/default cleanliness laws. Sources may provide scoped candidate features or falsification evidence, not direct action authority.

Output algebra

LintAdmitted(profile, scope, uncertainty)
AutoActionAdmitted(profile, action class, non-inferiority proof)
Rejected(claim, reason)
NotExamined(missing source/access/contract)
Experimental(explicit opt-in)

Lint admission never implies action admission.

RED / reproducibility

  • immutable source manifest/checksums/license/access;
  • executable extraction from source bytes;
  • negative/null/contradictory results retained;
  • study-level split guard;
  • no participant bootstrap without participant rows;
  • mutation from ordinal/distributional output to universal scalar fails;
  • mutation from lint to auto authority fails;
  • protected readability/identity/sentiment/distinction cannot regress;
  • no human profile still leaves TechnicalQuality total.

Acceptance

Refs #408 #431.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions