Skip to content

Fossil as resourceType instead of material type #33

Description

@smrgeoinfo

I suggest that 'fossil' should be a resourceType. The sampledFeature for the fossil is a species. The fossil 'occurs in' a geologic formation at a site. A material fossil is 'composed of' some material, but fossil is not a material, and a fossil is not collected with the intention of sampling a material (except as it relates to the fossil). Fossil should not be a material type. Early versions of GeoSciML attempted to model material fossils as a material type, but this proved unworkable. The current version (OGC standard) 4.1 does not include a class specifically for fossil, but represents material fossils as a particle type, and trace fossils or molds as a kind of geologicStructure (analogous to sedimentary structures).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions