Skip to content

process_pattern_baseline.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (92 loc) · 2.61 KB

process_pattern_baseline.md

File metadata and controls

125 lines (92 loc) · 2.61 KB

Process Pattern Baseline

Scope

This file records reusable process patterns observed at metadata level across existing task-operation projects. It does not copy task content, private data, client material, or project-specific deliverables.

The baseline is used only to judge whether Workstream captures the operating model common to serious task evaluation and contribution systems.

Observed Reusable Pattern

Across projects, the same control structure appears with different names:

Project Guide
-> Queue / Lane Status
-> Task Workspace Record
-> Preflight / Checker Scripts
-> Review Guard
-> Submission Packet
-> Review Packet
-> Evidence / Verification Log
-> Needs Revision Replay
-> Accepted / Rejected / Payment Status
-> Contribution Record
-> Workflow Lessons

Common Artifacts

Project Guide

Defines:

  • project purpose
  • task fit
  • quality bar
  • required materials
  • submission format
  • review expectations
  • common failure modes

Queue Status

Tracks:

  • draft or screening work
  • ready work
  • active work
  • submitted work
  • needs revision
  • accepted
  • rejected
  • payment state

Some projects also use explicit lane capacity rules, such as keeping only one live execution active while preparing future tasks in a ready lane.

Review Guard

Defines:

  • blockers
  • major risks
  • minor risks
  • decision labels
  • adversarial review questions
  • human-writing quality checks
  • returned-feedback replay rules

Checker Scripts

Common script roles:

  • start task
  • preflight task
  • package submission
  • run ready gate
  • update queue status
  • summarize queue
  • validate rubric or review packet
  • audit workflow state

Submission And Review Packets

Packets preserve:

  • final deliverable
  • required metadata
  • evidence
  • checker answers
  • review notes
  • revision history
  • packaging status

Evidence And Lessons

Repeated strong projects keep:

  • verification logs
  • review-readiness evidence
  • workflow lessons
  • status histories
  • review rounds

This is how local memory becomes reusable process.

Workstream Implications

Workstream must support:

  • versioned project guides
  • queue lanes derived from status
  • project-specific review guards
  • automated checker policies
  • review-readiness evidence before review
  • submission and review packet records
  • revision replay tied to prior findings
  • contribution records created from accepted evidence-backed work
  • lessons learned promoted into guides, checkers, or templates
  • payment status separate from task status

Non-Goals

Workstream does not import or depend on project-specific task content.

The transferable asset is the operating model, not the data.