Skip to content

Steps needed to enable BLAZE within CABLE/ACCESS independently of POP #727

Description

@har917

This is a placeholder/umbrella issue for (likely) several issues that will be spread across the various repos

At the risk of getting ahead of ourselves (6/2026) - BLAZE has been partially reconfigured so that the science code can operate without POP (note that operate /= equivalent). This opens up the possibility of enabling BLAZE within ACCESS ahead of the more difficult task of merging the CABLE and CABLE-POP lines of development.

However there are some tasks that require additional effort (within CABLE and/or ACCESS) before this is possible.

From a technical perspective:

  1. all additional state variables need to be identified and (for ACCESS at least) included in the restart. This includes elements of the climate% TYPE and (at least) sumBLAZE%annBA (since we need to cover monthly chunking in AM3).
  2. rewriting the climate% MODULE so that only the necessary calculations/variables are required.
  3. a better method of passing information about which patches/tiles belong in which grid cell needs to be designed and implemented across all applications. Currently this relies on USEing the land_pts% construct which is specific to offline simulations.
  4. testing with non-zero grid cell fractions for lake, bare soil, urban and ice needs to be undertaken.
  5. testing with phosphorus cycle active (noting that we shouldn't lose P with fire, instead convert it between pools - this is unlike C and N).
  6. general i/o considerations - e.g. parallelisation, namelist read/distribution, adding additional outputs to standard CABLE offline output, default values, frequency of read etc. and (in ACCESS) where different bits of the memory sit.

I expect 3. and 6. to be the most problematic

From a science perspective:

  • consideration of fire season start and how to reset variables accordingly.
  • encapsulating the dependence between fire events and biophysical parameters such as surface reflectences (i.e. albedo) and possibly canopy height.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions