Value-prop review. The disagreement/convergence value prop (the thing PRODUCT.md leads with) exists for exactly ~8 concepts with ≥2 measurements; the other ~91 are single-method, so the headline 'competing methods triangulate' banner is DARK for 92% of the library. PR2's 'watch it build' reveal animates a result computed in one synchronous call — the program's own honesty principle calls faked streaming 'theater'. The flagship report is 42% coverage (27/64), gaps clustering on the decision-driving questions → reads 'incomplete' to an LP, and forwarding it is reputationally negative for the sender. Actions: (1) cut PR2 to a thin instant tree with source+assumption-defense at each node (≈90% value, 20% cost, more on-brand); (2) gate the forwardable report on a coverage floor for decision-critical categories, and count 'well-defended modeled answer' as coverage not gap; (3) for the demo, pre-pick the query + a real degrade-to-sourced-skeleton fallback for off-script queries.
Value-prop review. The disagreement/convergence value prop (the thing PRODUCT.md leads with) exists for exactly ~8 concepts with ≥2 measurements; the other ~91 are single-method, so the headline 'competing methods triangulate' banner is DARK for 92% of the library. PR2's 'watch it build' reveal animates a result computed in one synchronous call — the program's own honesty principle calls faked streaming 'theater'. The flagship report is 42% coverage (27/64), gaps clustering on the decision-driving questions → reads 'incomplete' to an LP, and forwarding it is reputationally negative for the sender. Actions: (1) cut PR2 to a thin instant tree with source+assumption-defense at each node (≈90% value, 20% cost, more on-brand); (2) gate the forwardable report on a coverage floor for decision-critical categories, and count 'well-defended modeled answer' as coverage not gap; (3) for the demo, pre-pick the query + a real degrade-to-sourced-skeleton fallback for off-script queries.