1.20 support!

[AomiRaku]

very need!!! thannnnnnnnks!

[rakantoh]

+1, please update to 1.20-1.20.x, this mod is now elemental for me, many thanks

[amomentspeace]

hope he does it soon

[lluxia]

The main issue with updating this mod to 1.20 is Stacc API. This mod depends on Stacc API to work. Even if we update this mod to 1.20, it won't run because Stacc API would crash the game since it still needs to be updated to 1.20 by its author.

[rakantoh]

The main issue with updating this mod to 1.20 is Stacc API. This mod depends on Stacc API to work. Even if we update this mod to 1.20, it won't run because Stacc API would crash the game since it still needs to be updated to 1.20 by its author.

ok, i understand that depends of the stac api, however, i think that andrew is capable of modify/update stacc api, may be i am wrong, but may be andrew can fork the stacc api project and modify/update it. anyways, i wait for the update of stacker soon.

[topia]

You can also do it yourself if you mention forking/modifying upstream code. Sending the patch (as a pull request) is a good starting point to achieve your goal; This mod is his second mod; please calm down.

[rakantoh]

You can also do it yourself if you mention forking/modifying upstream code. Sending the patch (as a pull request) is a good starting point to achieve your goal; This mod is his second mod; please calm down.

it was only a comment... calm down yourself, andrew are a programmer, and as programmer he can edit the neccesary api, you and me (or at least me) aren't programmers, so i can't edit any mod... please don't be rude, this is only a comment and suggestions space, so please be more respecful... i only post a option or sugerence...

[topia]

I apologize for not understanding your respect for the author in your comment. Now I know that you have a different view of modding/programming than me. Modding new (another) thing requires new knowledge/research; sometimes, they should repeat try-and-failure many times. I prefer to mention contributing (or forking) upstream if they already modified the upstream code or decided to do it.
I think modding is motivated by the hope of improving something. And (learning) programming is also motivated by the same. If you think the mod is elemental, you might have good motivation to start learning programming.

[rakantoh]

I apologize for not understanding your respect for the author in your comment. Now I know that you have a different view of modding/programming than me. Modding new (another) thing requires new knowledge/research; sometimes, they should repeat try-and-failure many times. I prefer to mention contributing (or forking) upstream if they already modified the upstream code or decided to do it. I think modding is motivated by the hope of improving something. And (learning) programming is also motivated by the same. If you think the mod is elemental, you might have good motivation to start learning programming.

Yeah, the mod are elemental for me, as a player/gamer, not as programmer, and yes, i have very respect to andrew and for all good modders that do all types of mods, i know how hard is doing a mod, and for this is my respect to andrew and all modders that do this possible, giving us more fun and new content for the games.

[BaccarWozat]

I can play the game without Stacker, but it always entails finding all the inventories with >64 items per stack and moving them into other chests, before updating the version. (It usually takes about 3 hours to move everything.) Fortunately, I have a large base with lots of room for extra items, but this has been happening every new MC version, and that assumes Stacker didn't break during snapshots...
Every time, I keep thinking it will reach the point that Mojang will stop messing with inventory code so Fabric could be made to ignore Stacker's version dependency, but it keeps breaking anyway.
Oh well. Not anyone's fault, and I will await whatever happens.

[rakantoh]

I can play the game without Stacker, but it always entails finding all the inventories with >64 items per stack and moving them into other chests, before updating the version. (It usually takes about 3 hours to move everything.) Fortunately, I have a large base with lots of room for extra items, but this has been happening every new MC version, and that assumes Stacker didn't break during snapshots... Every time, I keep thinking it will reach the point that Mojang will stop messing with inventory code so Fabric could be made to ignore version dependency, but it keeps breaking anyway. Oh well. Not anyone's fault, and I will await whatever happens.

i prefer to stay in the latest version compatible with stacker and wait for the mod update, precisely for to not move the items between chests, i have a lot of chest and rooms too, but i prefer wait.

[rakantoh]

I think that stacker will not have more updates, it's sad, anyways thanks to andrew for this great mod, and i want to someone continue to the development of this mod, with the permission and approval of andrew of course.

[AmibeSkyfy16]

There is a similar mod called stackable127 available on CF and MR
https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/stackable127

[sandgray]

The main issue with updating this mod to 1.20 is Stacc API. This mod depends on Stacc API to work. Even if we update this mod to 1.20, it won't run because Stacc API would crash the game since it still needs to be updated to 1.20 by its author.

https://github.com/Noaaan/Stacc/tree/master ???

[rakantoh]

The main issue with updating this mod to 1.20 is Stacc API. This mod depends on Stacc API to work. Even if we update this mod to 1.20, it won't run because Stacc API would crash the game since it still needs to be updated to 1.20 by its author.

https://github.com/Noaaan/Stacc/tree/master ???

ok, stacc api are updated to 1.20/1.20.x, now wait stacker to be updated too

[FumpleWumper]

Leaving my comment here as well! I miss this mod everyday when I'm playing in 1.20 and my inventory gets filled up with building materials!