Replies: 2 comments
|
A comment on the validation part. It will be good to directly use the SHACL definitions instead of NEK or other extensions |
0 replies
yes, definitely. We should follow the validation-report. DIGIT has also seen the need for a summary report and we should follow their model for the summery. The model about is the current AutoFOS model. We might need to suggest to the SHACL community a way of creating a whitelist.. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
AutoFOS is extending the CGMES v2.5 (sixth IOP)
Looking like Core Manifest:

Validation:

Moving forward by using JSON-LD and rely on W3C standard. The following W3C:
All reactions